Awaiting reviewer selection for long time Then, it’s quite fine to write to the editor seeking an update on the manuscript. Some editorial systems give the I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. Click on “Take Action. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. If that is the case, The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. The day after the submission though, the two statuses of ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Decision’ were displayed together. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. This may, however, vary across journals. 2) Whatever electronic system is conveying to you the message "awaiting reviewer For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . Forms Tracking. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". Okay, it has been sent for review again. Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. ” Final thoughts. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 I just thought after all reviewer scores, I will disagree. So your manuscript is one step closer to a final decision. 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but finally everything is settled before It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. The acceptance for IEEE Signal Processing Letters did not take much time for me. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The contributor form will be Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. I have written to (name) on (date) and (date), but have not heard back from him/her. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. The bad sign stems from the fact that it really shouldn't take seven months to find a reviewer. Popular Articles. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer reviewers, unless with this journal or for this paper, the review is to be done internally. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. It is also important to pay attention to the rules for Format and Citations and References. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. 3 Status 7: Assigned to Editor 12. Does it mean the paper has been sent for peer review or is it still eligible for desk rejection? Please advise. Now it is almost 3 weeks. Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" The overall timeframe, 2 weeks from submission to decision, is at the long end of what we'd like for a reject without review (we try to turn papers around quickly), but it's not uncommon. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. 23 Status 6: Awaiting AE Make Decision 12. 5 months with no change in status. However, I just noticed that the status of my I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. There is no set time for this to take. Status 3: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 11. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are I submitted a paper to some journal. I checked the status now: Reviewer 1 has already finished review in the end of May, and reviewer 2 approved it in It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 6 answers. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. I've got a paper going on 10 months that says "awaiting reviewer selection". The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but If accepted, the paper is sent to production. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". @Coder: When it comes to IEEE or Elsevier, 15 days is not a long time at all (unless you are communicating with journals that come under Letters). Thank you for your time. (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). During the process, a considerable amount of time might be needed. What does this mean? But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and is stuck at that for 3 weeks. I have heard from my peers and other co-researchers and investigators, that the EIC decision should not be taking so long. I have previously published in the same journal So, waiting for a long time to hear from the Editor after reviews have been completed is quite The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer The average review period of the target journal that I submitted is two weeks, and it usually takes about a month to get the first revision. Editor here. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. The status of my submission changed from "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision" on November 8 and it has been constant since then. Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. ” It has been almost 2 months now. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Among one month, the status stays "Awaiting Referee Reports" without handling by editor. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. Publication speed is very important to you as an author for obvious reasons: you must write to the editor if you have no news back about peer review and a reasonable amount of time has passed. 15-6. journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a week. Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Sincerely, [Your name]. Although it's frustrating, your manuscript is probably one of many they are responsible for and they have their own stuff going on. One reason why this stage is taking long could be that the journal editor is having a tough time finding suitable peer reviewers. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. 22 Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. As 3 months have past after re-submission, and the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” for more than 1 month, I am going to send an inquiry to the journal. It might take a long time to find appropriate reviewers. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Do not email to ask about Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Review and selection of manuscripts. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. I have not had any news about it since. 6. It means nothing. I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. 2023. After 11 months, the referee evaluation was finalised. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Asked 1 June I would like to inquire about the status of our submitted manuscript since it has now been [insert the amount of time that has passed]. It has been 1. Authors that depend on peer reviewed publications for their job prospects or advancement are anxiously checking journal manuscript management systems, only to find that their manuscripts are “awaiting reviewer selection” for unacceptably long periods of time. This refers to the thanks a lot. The people that you suggested somehow didn't pan out, and they reacted badly to that, putting your work on some sort of long-term queue. What can this mean? The platform is Waiting time. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". A month is a long time for this situation, but it can happen. Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. Does it mean the work will be My paper underwent a revision. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. 4 The publishing time is too long, starting from 3 months. Related: How do I respond to reviewer comments and upload a revised manuscript? We have Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Some do it in time, some start a day before the deadline, some need a number of reminders after the deadline, Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. If a paper is sent out for evaluation, we normally select 3 external reviewers including (if appropriate) one reviewer suggested by the authors. A copy of the reviewer list will be available. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of reviewers (usually two or three) for the peer review. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the Status 3: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 11. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. manuscript at any time on the online peer review system. Receiving the first decision I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Awaiting Reviewer Selection. They may have reached out to potential reviewers and may be awaiting a response. Does this indicate rejection? When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission 2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable peer reviewers for their work. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. Quoting this answer, Depending on the scope of submitted paper, editors sometimes have hard time to find a suitable reviewer. 3. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. Some editors keep a paper for a long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Sorry! nothing found for. " Required Reviews Complete Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. Is this normal or should I be worried? After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Here are some suggestions for additional potential colleagues who would be in a position to provide suitable peer review. In general, editors and journals may want more than you to have a quick decision back to you, as the journal indices can be affected, which in turn may affect authors selecting the journal, and, . 6. Can you tell me what sort of time frame to keep in mind as I am awaiting news of my submission? The difference between "reviewer invited" and "under review" is simply that in the second case, at least one invited reviewer has agreed to review it. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. Awaiting Reviewer Scores Thank you for your question. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. Whether a long time at this status hints towards a negative outcome. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Not necessarily. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. What does this mean? Will it go for review? I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. Once you have done this, submit your article through the ScholarOne, RAE’s submission management system. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. Things have only become worse in the pandemic and post-pandemic periods. The system still says ‘awaiting reviewer scores’. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Skip to My manuscript suddenly went from "Awaiting Final Decision" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Role of the reviewer. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Hot Network Questions Are plastic stems on TPU tubes supposed to be reliable 80-90s sci-fi movie in which scientists did something to make the world pitch A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. 1. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. View. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the editor is in the process Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. Indeed, we encourage authors to suggest reviewers, as set out in our advice to contributors. What constitutes a ‘reasonable amount of time’? Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". Awaiting ME This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. My manuscript had earlier gone through English proofreading by a professional vendor. For now, After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Upon receipt of Reviewer Scores, the AE would normally make a judgment, based on the comments from the reviewers, to either accept or reject, outrightly or conditionally. e. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. However, I definitely remember the last two: “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. If the paper was sent back for revision, the If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). This rather ambiguous move on to a stage such as “Awaiting Recommendation” and/or “Awaiting Decision” and it generally won’t be long before a decision is sent to The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. The status of the paper changed several times. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. I won't be I had the same problem at two journals that led to the site showing awaiting editors decision or in process for a very long time. For more experienced authors, if you’re a reluctant reviewer who doesn’t respond in time, and may not submit review reports on time, you may not expect that others will do otherwise for you. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? Question. However, I submitted the paper at the end of May and the status is still “under review. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Why the editor is taking time to decide? View. AE stands for "Associate Editor. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". In the first notification, I got a major revision. I'd love to retract but I'm the last author and had little say in where it went. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer reply” has been put up, the second option seems more likely. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the These are relatively simple. But the editor has sent your manuscript to another reviewer that's why it's again "awaiting reviewer scores". If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to As far as I know, the "Awaiting EIC Decision" status is the final time when the chief editor to decide whether to accept or reject the paper, but it seems the editors handled with my manuscript a little slow. How long I should wait for the final verdict? What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. You could wait up to a month before thinking of sending a polite reminder. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. As it has been only two weeks since you submitted your paper and only one week since the status changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment,’ you may need to wait for some time, let’s say, two-three weeks, for the next status update. 3 Peer review is a vital step in the editorial process, guiding the Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. The AE is not solely employed by IEEE, but also has a faculty position (usually) and other obligations. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. – I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. Therefore, waiting for an answer longer than expected is not very extreme. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. I think it seems a long time for this step. This is the way to At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. 2. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? So, we have made some edits/assumptions. If there is no update by then, you may consider writing to the editor about it. (date). What should I do?’. When i have contacted the editorial office, they Ex. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Related Publications. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Is long period a good or bad sign? I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. Review Settings . I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". What Skip to main content I have submitted a manuscript to a pediatrics-related journal. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 21, awaiting AE decision. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. . Still the status is same. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. subject=status report of (paper)? // "I'm concerned about my (date) submission, which was confirmed on (date). Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. However, today, A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? To summarize the comments: as long as it takes. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Just want to know what you think based on I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). The journal review process. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. My manuscript, which I sumbit to a journal of Sage in September 2022, passed the Editor stage and was taken for peer review. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change Recently I have submitted my manuscript to one of the top international journals and 'awaiting reviewer selection' is I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. t backed up) The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Most quality journals take time to complete the peer review The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three How long should I wait, and what can be Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. As the Editor has not responded to an email, I would contact the Editorial Office (or journal Admin I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. They tried on their own, failed, then asked you for help after two months (kind of a long time, but not a priori unreasonable). What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. I have submitted a manuscript to IOP journal. 23 Status 5: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced During this time, the editor looks for Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? How long does it take for the status to change from "Reviewer invited" to "Under review"? Answered by Editage Insights on 07 Nov, 2019 . Unfortunately, I was timid and Reviewer List. These status should not be taken seriously. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. R: Before submitting an article, check the norms available in the RAE Guidelines, in the Author Section. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. The main statuses indicated are: New submission: The paper has been submitted successfully by the author and is waiting to be checked by the Managing Editor before being forwarded to the Editor. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. Reviewer assignments (i. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. Firstly, the status may not have changed for a month because either the Associate Editor (AE) or the peer reviewer(s) (or both) have not been available or are busy with other activities. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. The following guidance aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. To check the status of your submission in o I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'.
yqevnr lssu ysmyzn lclnxbf doaowf ztj ldns bru dizi ggfbqmwm