First factor requirement satisfied by claim in the token azure MFA Requirement Satisfied By Claim In The Token costs an individual and organizations an extra investment of time and money, but the additional layer of security makes it worthwhile with *When you have enforced per-user MFA and you are using Windows Hello, the MFA requirement is already satisfied by the claim in the token. This JWT token is signed by a special key, which I will discuss later in this article. It also lists "First factor requirement satisfied by claim in the token". Figure 1. The wording for the MFA is: The is_primary indicates that this cookie is a primary refresh token. Authentication requirement Multifactor authentication Status Success Continuous access evaluation No Additional Details MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token Token issuer type Azure AD Token issuer name Incoming token type Primary refresh token . (mfa requirement satisfied by claim in the token) This new security measure requires customers to meet extra authentication requirements, which can be satisfied by claiming their token. "MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token" means that an MFA requirement was enforced when the authority issued the token. First factor requirement satisfied by claim in the token Primary authentication MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token User Password Password Hash Sync true Multi-factor authentication Mobile app notification true MFA Something about primary refresh token . Unique token identifier: A unique identifier for the token passed during the sign-in. Required MFA for all Azure users will be rolled out in phases starting in the 2 nd half of calendar year 2024 to provide our customers time to plan their implementation: Phase 1: Starting in October, MFA will be required to sign-in to Azure portal, Microsoft Entra admin center, and Intune admin center. Preparing for mandatory Azure MFA. Understand the different types of claims, how to configure Identity Server, and code modification techniques for authentication with MFA. Now, let's verify that we've used SSO without further challenge to another application or resource. End users who are accessing apps, websites or services hosted on Azure This token includes the claim that MFA was performed – but Entra ID is ignoring it and showing single-factor for authentication. The log schemas for Azure Monitor might differ from the Microsoft Graph schemas. 1. The is_primary indicates that this cookie is a primary refresh token. You can access the Registration tab to show the number of users capable For more information, see the Conditional Access for external users section. Azure Active Directory multi-factor check for authorization. For full details on these schemas, see the following articles: Azure Monitor . This could be legitimate, or the account could be getting flagged for a token theft issue. Note: I understand that using custom controls such as Duo result in a "single-factor" auth as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) requires multiple verification factors for access. . How can we rectify this or is their another way to accomplish our goal. conwaymarks (conway4358 says to “Skip multi-factor authentication for Authentication Details shows that the single-factor auth was "previously satisfied". When Azure AD issues a token, it contains information (claims) such as the username, source IP address, MFA, and more. On the report I have one user who has the MFA result "MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token" when signing in on Skype Web Experience On Office 365 or Office365 Shell WCSS-Client. Checking user sign-ins I can see After reviewing the logs it says “MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token”. Depending on the Windows sign-in (Password, FIDO2 key, Backround It is highly recommended especially (at time like this) to ensure, you are not giving easy access to your environment for possible malicious parties. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication completed in the cloud has expired due to the policies configured on tenant registration prompted satisfied by claim in the token satisfied by claim provided by external provider satisfied by strong authentication skipped I am however logged in to Edge (chromium) with my azure AD. Looking in the Azure AD Sign-On logs for App A, the seamless logon shows this: MFA Result: MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token. This happens frequently when you enable federation and the federated identity provider enforces MFA: tokens are generated with an MFA claim. For example, search or filter the results for when the MFA results field has a value of MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token. In the AD sign-in logs, it shows that the attackers IP logged in first time and both the password and MFA "were satisfied by claim in the token. Registration details. Microsoft explains under what circumstances the PRT gets the MFA claim and is thus able to satisfy a Conditional Access MFA requirement. microsoft-office-365, microsoft-azure, question. I'm in the process of a MFA rollout to my users. There are two tabs in the report: Registration and Usage. I have access controls set to "Grant access, Require multi-factor authentication", and session set to "Sign-in frequency - 1 hour". The For license and role requirements, see Microsoft Entra monitoring and health licensing. No phone call. Let’s take a Learn to use tokens and claims to satisfy compliance and multi-factor authentication (MFA) requirements while maintaining security. When a Microsoft Entra organization shares resources with external users with an identity provider other than Microsoft Entra ID, the authentication flow depends on whether the user is authenticating with an identity provider or -Create folder for semantic plugins inside Plugins folder, in this case its "AzureMonitor". Let’s take a closer look. Read for example here: Since the same conditional access policy is being applied and the MFA requirement shows "previously satisfied", it's possible that the PRT with an MFA claim has been used. Skip multi-factor authentication for requests from federated users on my intranet is not selected in service settings. One of their staff had their account breached (and re-sent out the phishing link). Depending upon the result of user’s actions and other factors, the provider would then construct and send a response back to Microsoft Entra ID, as When you have enforced per-user MFA and you are using Windows Hello, the MFA requirement is already satisfied by the claim in the token Probably, when using a older tenant or having Azure AD identities which do exist for over a few years they could still be configured with Per-user MFA. A 'claim' in a token indicates that the required MFA factors have been satisfied, allowing the user to access the secured resource. Your user MFA’d - without knowing it. The user then presents that token to the web application, which validates the token and allows the user access. The token's claims are typically secured through digital signatures or encryption. For details about the claims provided in the id_token_hint, see Default id_token_hint claims. This post gives some examples to investigate possible gaps in your A Primary Refresh Token (PRT) is a key artifact of Microsoft Entra authentication on Windows 10 or newer, Windows Server 2016 and later versions, iOS, and Android devices. It's a JSON Web Token (JWT) specially issued to So, when this user attempts to access a resource that has an Azure AD Conditional Access Policy requiring MFA, Azure AD silently “sees” the PRT and the existing MFA claim – and the user won’t be prompted for MFA. Activity Details: Sign-ins > Basic Info Additional Details MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token Activity Details: Sign-ins > Conditional Access Policy Name: Not applicable Activity Details: Sign-ins > Report Only Enforce MFA (Cisco AnyConnect) Require multi-factor authentication Session Control: <blank> Report-only: Success With Windows Hello for Business enabled, you’re always using strong authentication and the MFA claims are satisfied automatically. (SIEM) connectivity, long-term storage, and improved querying capabilities with Log Analytics. If your organization uses ADFS and Since the same conditional access policy is being applied and the MFA requirement shows "previously satisfied", it's possible that the PRT with an MFA claim has been used. Cloud Computing & SaaS. Regards, Share Sort by: Best. This JWT token is signed by a special key, which I We want to clarify that all users signing into the Azure portal, Azure CLI, Azure PowerShell and IaC tools, such as Azure Developer CLI, Bicep, Terraform and Ansible to perform any CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operation will require MFA when the enforcement begins. (For more details on plugins) -Create Folder for semantic function inside the skills folder ie '/plugin/AzureMonitor', in this case "KQLquery-Signin" (For more details on functions) The logs say, " MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token" Is there anything else you are doing to secure M365 logins? Typically, a conditional access rule to block foreign country logins would help, but the hacker had a US-based location in this instance. This is because when you sign in with WH4B, a Primary Refresh Token (PRT) gets generated at that initial sign in and is presented to all other Azure AD applications when they’re accessed. Looking in the Azure AD Sign-On logs for App A, the seamless logon shows this: MFA Result: MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token Where App B doesn't seem to I noticed that in the authentication details, it says "MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token". Open comment sort options Previously satisfied true First factor requirement satisfied by claim in the token Primary authentication 3/1/2021, こちらのブログによると、MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the tokenと出ている場合、MFAを行わなかったとあります。 確かにWHfBを使ってWindowsサインインを行った場合、サインインのタイミングでAzure ADにアクセスするためのトークン(PRT)をもらえるので、改めてMFA All our tests with Conditional Access Policies were unsuccessful: in the sign-in logs we always found the condition: "MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token". This At 4:17:59, the MFA is reported as a Success event with additional details of MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token. Where App B doesn't seem to respect the token and or is not being presented by it. As you can see it says "MFA requirement satisfied by In additional details is says "MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token" - that's the MFA token that stops users from being nagged every hour. I'm using the Azure AD Sign-ins report to see if users have set up MFA on their accounts. Then carry out any other authentication activity that the provider’s product is built to do. Note that this is NOT using third-party controls for Entra ID – that is not external federation and so third party Request ID: An identifier that corresponds to an issued token. Using the Desktop WVD program, the prompts are even less consistent. At that point, depending on policy, they may be required to complete MFA. A PRT can also get a multi-factor authentication (MFA) claim in specific scenarios. What exactly does this mean? Is it because her device is Azure AD registered(not Microsoft explains under what circumstances the PRT gets the MFA claim and is thus able to satisfy a Conditional Access MFA requirement. Some of the events/details in sign-in logs: MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token. If you're looking for sign-ins with a specific token, you need to extract the request ID from the token, first. This identifier is used to correlate the sign-in with the token request. Spiceworks Community o365 mfa. So I guess you now know what the Sign-In report will tell you when you have disabled the per-user MFA and you are using conditional access. The refresh_token contains the actual PRT, which is an encrypted blob by a key which is managed by Azure AD. No pop-up. Once you have downloaded the results, look for the value “MFA requirement satisfied by claim in the token” in the “MFA result” field. What does this mean ? Access sign-in logs directly from the Microsoft Entra area in the Azure portal, use the Get-MgBetaAuditLogSignIn cmdlet, or view them in the Logs area of Microsoft Sentinel. The Authentication Details events report that first factor and MFA have been previously satisfied. MFA challenged is validated by "MFA completed in Azure AD". I understand that the recommendation is to " Configure authentication session management with Conditional Access ", but this solution cannot force the MFA challenge for every From the access logs in Azure somebody in Nigeia logged in and approved MFA notification that was sent to the app. OAuth Token flow chart. Authentication flow for non-Azure AD external users. If MFA was satisfied, this column provides more information about how MFA was satisfied. To access authentication method usage and insights: Sign in to the Microsoft Entra admin center as at least an Authentication Policy Administrator. Remember multi-factor authentication on trusted device is not selected in service settings. It will just show you the Single-Factor requirement. No SMS code to put in. There are scenarios, such as when logging in from a Azure AD joined device via PRT, where MFA requirements are automatically satisfied. You can also use the Get-AzureADAuditSignInLogs cmdlet ( see the details here ) and filter the results to only return entries that match this field value, as seen in this example: Does the Primary Refresh Token (PRT) on an Azure AD Joined Windows 10 device satisfy an Azure AD Conditional Access MFA requirement? Most of the time, with some exceptional cases when it doesn’t. Browse to Protection > Authentication Methods > Activity. tawpb bcobco yfnlk hhhad wwm ehbsmc rsjptjc zuztjpi kuvhdq bljv